I have again (look at my post from 7 Nov. 2008) found a heart in my fridge. Yes, it sounds funny but it again made me very happy – I like believing in signs. I started analysing what all this food coming to me in form of a heart could mean. I wished for something egoistic. But then as I was pealing the potato to make a soup, I realized that each piece of food that came from mother earth actually is a little heart. They don’t have to have a heart form. Because they are pure love – they are the signs and gifts mother nature is giving us to tell us “I love you”. Because they keep us alive. And healthy. And all it takes is some soil, sun and rain. That is all we should need to survive.
I am not joking: we should see each piece of food nature gave us as a little heart. And each time we take it into our hand we should say “Thank you”.
Our major problem as a society is that we are ungrateful.
Tags: Consumerism, Love, System

No – our main problem is that we slice the love symbol up and fry it in oil and then eat 2 bags of it in front of the TV every day.
well, if you turn it upside down it looks like a butt, so …
This tells us something very important, i.e things are the product of our own perception, more than just an object (they kind of “belong” to us), but less than a subject (they don’t rule us). you are the god of your own world in way, making things to be what they are by watching them through your eyes.
now referring to the “love” issue, i finally found the answer: “if you can see love, there is love” all you have to do is open up your eyes and if you catch a sign of it in your own heart, do trust that feeling and try to not lose sight of it again. As they say, “if you like it, you put (kind of) a ring on it”. so prolly the solution to all this spoiled and inane thinking and behaviour is to bravely return to our dreams and make them true by setting aside all the overvalued critical thinking, that makes hollow stuff appear more realistic (and important) than it truly is. what is it worth anyway when you can look at the same thing and find two equally correct meanings in it?
and now the cheesy line of the day:
“on ne voit bien qu’avec le coeur, l’essentiel est invisible pour les yeux”
yesterday after dinner and a couple of beers I felt beeing loved too much!!!!
merci the big eye pour le petit prince…
you guys are great but there’s one thing bothering me. where are the girls? why don’t they have anything to say?
or is my site constructed so that only men can leave comments?
Here is a comment by Mickey Van which I deleted by mistake (sorry Mickey!):
to come back to the original thought: i think you are right about the basics of soil, sun and rain. it’s as natural as it is political, it goes for the heart, the big eyes and the little princes. bon appétit, and enjoy!