Holidays in a coma (stole this from Beigbeder)

January 13th, 2010

God, this is just as horrible as the Tsunami was five years ago.

Why do catastrophes like this always hit the poorest regions of the world? On the other hand, I guess that this is part of the reason why they are poor.

And the most horrible is – my friends have left to Carribean today in the morning. For holidays. To spend their money on five star hotels (are there any left?) and basking in the sun. That constant clash of rich and poor, catastrophe and extravaganza, emergency and abundance. Out world is far from healthy….

My sympathy goes to people of Haiti.

Altruism for sale

January 11th, 2010

Have you noticed the new trend: “altruism for sale”? Yes, we are now we are selling out altruism to the corporations! Helping others, making a difference, the most crucial aspect in our feeling of fulfilment is being sold out. Altruism, so precious for our well being, has lately been suffering a crisis just as big, if not bigger, than our economy. We lose altruism, here comes 1984!

Buy a certain Gucci bag and 25% of the retail price will go to UNICEF (for the trick, check out the small letters: only if you buy it between 16 November and 31 December). Kate Spade’s new collection is featuring those cute mittens and hats, all hand-made by women in Bosina. Those women get $7 pro piece, which is, according to Spade, double of what they normal wages. Oh how nice! The small letters say: It is a day’s work to knit such a hat. Its retail price is $85. Is it great help, is it fair, should we really be proud to make people earn $7 a day, only 500km from here? How about teaching them to fish instead of giving them a (small) fish? Roberto Coin, jewellery designer is helping CARE. A percentage of every package of Pampers goes to some charity (sorry, no details, am not into diapers). If you subscribe to The Economist, they will plant a tree for you. And you can even watch your tree online….

The trick is new: they are trying to make us feel better about spending money on unnecessary, overpriced stuff and keep the vicious circle of consumerism alive by promising that our action will benefit someone. Instant clearance of consciousness. Instant great feeling. Of course, the ones that benefit the most are the corporations. Rich getting richer. The effect is sad: we are deep into learning to hand over our responsibilities, decisions, even feelings, to the corporations. We only need to consume and everything else will be taken care of. This distances us even further from the actual problem. We don’t need to understand what is going on, and why. We don’t have to consciously decide to help someone, we don’t have to chose whom and why. Gucci/Economist/Spade will take care of that. And nothing changes. Gucci keeps on making millions, we keep on slaving to afford a Gucci bag and women in Bosnia keep on living in poverty. But hey, now we feel good about it! Thank you Gucci/Economist/Spade/Pampers.

Horny, monogamous, glowing Hulks

January 8th, 2010

Great! I’m reading in The Economist that scientists have identified both the hormone for monogamy and the protein molecule that acts as a receptor. It is called vasopressin. They have already turned a certain “promiscuous” mice type into monogamous mice. And out of some reason (I’ve lost the thread here), the article continues explaining how scientists also managed to create mice which glow in the dark. So hey, we’re ready to go. But the article ends with “It may be some time before such interventions are available for human males, but women can always live in hope.” Which asshole wrote that article? Like all men are promiscuous and all women are not…

Anyway, I was trying to imagine they really invented a pill for monogamy. Would anyone want to take that pill on their free will? And if not, would we end up with WOmen  (this is not a typo) secretly feeding their men the pill….Then I came to the cocktail of pills they could also give their men to improve them a bit, if they have already invented the secret pill-feeding technique. A pill for monogamy, a pill for weight-loss, a pill for building muscles (do anabolica exist only as injections or also as pills?), a pill against hair loss, a little blue-pill called Viagra for… well, you know for what. We would end up with a world full of mad Hulks running after their exhausted wives with big hard-ons, glowing in the dark. How about a new game: “Recognise your Hulk by his… hmmm…glow!”?

Nay, let’s rather like our men the way they are. Like Austrian author David Schalko said, you can always forgive infidelity, as long as you don’t know about it.

The Economist article

Cardiac Arrest

December 21st, 2009

Yes, I was shocked as I read that Brittany Murphy died at the age of 32. Yet another young celebrity died of “cardiac arrest”. I don’t like young American celebrities dying of “cardiac arrest”. Have you ever heard that a young European star died of “cardiac arrest”? OK, I admit, I don’t read so much gossip press (although I do read it a bit), so maybe I am not that well informed. But all those “cardiac arrests” make me wonder.

When young stars of the older generation died, it was of an overdose. Drugs overdose. The bad stuff. Heroin & co. Now, they are dying of “cardiac arrest”. I would say they are dying of the “good” stuff. While the “bad stuff” had a certain attitude, lifestyle, and yes, romantic or rebellious touch to it, the “good stuff” has no special aura. It is normal. It is for everyone. After decades of the psychotherapy ruling, now the pharmaceutical industry has become, especially in the states, a new religion. New God. Only God can do magic and have a quick solution for everything. Depression, anxiety attacks, exhaustion, loss of appetite, too much appetite, loss of libido, hyperactivity, LIFE…: all stuff that you used to deal with on a different level, by getting to know yourself and your life better, and changing things that don’t work well – now you just close your eyes and swallow a pill. It is a new form of a prayer. Or, if you like it more bluntly – simply legalized drugs helping the pharmaceutical lobby earn a fortune. Someone has to.

I have an American friend who takes antidepressants, sleeping pills, muscle relaxants, appetite enhancers. I think the list of Austrian army’s weapons sounds less deadly. You just need to accidentally take a wrong pill or one too many and – oops, here comes the “cardiac arrest”. I don’t know. I just know I started liking my doctor more and more. Last time I had a bad case of sinusitis, I had to beg for antibiotics. On my knees. I didn’t get them. And the sinusitis went away. No “cardiac arrest” for me, thank you.

Join me at my reading tonight!

December 18th, 2009

I will be reading some new stories from my book “Von der Barbie zum Vibrator” tonight:

19:30

Lhotzkys Literaturbuffet

Rotensterngasse 2 (corner Taborstrasse)

1020 Vienna

Barbie_S

What we’ve learned from Tiger

December 17th, 2009

I must admit I was totally delighted about the news of Tiger’s crash caused by angry wife hitting the car with his golf clubs. My first thought was “Yes, yes, the clean boy is not co immaculate after all! There might be a tiger hidden in Tiger!”. My second thought was “Well, if she was so angry, maybe she didn’t only marry him for his status and money, maybe she really loves him” (My mistake at that moment was that I wasn’t considering the aspect of pride ). The whole story made me like him, and her, a bit more.

Yes, Tiger, the good boy of the good sport has turned out to be not so good after all. What have we learned?

  • Do not to believe everything you see in the media. Constructing an image of choice is so easy to do.
  • In our information society, it is impossible to keep things secret. So if you don’t want any problems, just don’t give them a chance. Can you really believe that a predator starlet will be so discrete not to publish your messages on internet? Even a golfer cannot be that naïve.
  • If you are a starlet, or in this case a bimbo aux pair, don’t be so naïve to believe that a man who married you because you are blond and pretty will not go for the next (fresher) blond and pretty, the moment he has a chance to do so.
  • One more time: a man is just a man. Which is bad and good. Bad because men are more prone to give in to temptation. Good because that makes them easy to manipulate (for those who know how to manipulate).  This is what made me so angry during the Clinton scandal. Is it really bad that a relatively handsome young man, currently most powerful person on this planet, who is married to Hillary (sorry, but…) gives in to a young attractive woman who throws herself at him every day? Or does it make him… well… yes, more manly, or at least, more sympathetic? We have this thing for people who are not all that perfect.  And we non-Tigers cannot even imagine how many gorgeous women work hard, and good, to get the Tiger. And tigers are usually out of the cage.  They are constantly on the road, constantly winning, constantly being admired, and constantly surrounded by female predators.
  • Yes, women hunting. You should not underestimate those women. Those women are gorgeous and they know their work. I know one or two. Finding a rich husband is the only goal in their life. They adopt everything to this goal – the way they dress, look, talk, jobs they do, travel destinations they go for, friends they have, cities they live in. They are extremely intelligent. They are fantastic manipulators. They are incredible risk-takers. And they are great strategists. Once they set their eyes on you, you cannot escape. You would have to be impotent or blind or on heavy drugs. And no woman wants a husband like that.
  • And last but not least. Here is the manifestation of the culture of choice and consumerism. We have more choice than we have ever had. And we have a feeling that we have even more choice than we actually do. We are tempted to go out and grab it all! Also, the aspect of exchanging something for something newer and better is starting to reflect from our behaviour as consumers to our behaviour as humans….

But one interesting question that stays open: Why do sex scandals not happen to successful women? Is it really because (most) women are simply not into sex?

Grinch stole Christmas, but who stole the presents?

December 14th, 2009

Every Christmas, I am tortured by the same philosophical question: What happened to presents??? They are here, but they are not. Presents are moving into the same direction like “And they lived happily forever after”: We like the whole idea, we like to try and keep it alive, but deep inside we know that they are just shadows from some past times. Yes, Christmas is coming and we’re all into that presents dilemma again. What to give? Everybody has everything! Is it still possible to give a present that will kick someone out of his/her shoes? I’m sceptical.

My parents keep telling me about the Christmases of their childhood, when they were excited about finding oranges and peanuts in a sock. I read Jane Austin’s novels in which getting a ribbon for your hat was, even for the ladies of more wealth, an ecstatic experience. And I remember my excitement of receiving a Barbie doll or a Hello Kitty pencil. All those things were rare, and that made them magical. What is still rare (and magical) today?

Yes, we all know that we are a doomed society based on materialism and consumption: Buying and throwing away keeps the world going around. But there is another depressing aspect to the extinction of presents: we are generally slowly losing the capability to ad that something extra to each-other’s lives. Can someone still give me something that a) I would still get very excited about and b) I cannot give to myself? We don’t really need each other any more, do we? And by losing that practical necessity, we are also slowly loosing the capability to give magic. A woman used to need a man to provide for the survival of the family. A man used to need a woman to spread his genes and take care of him and the kids. Parents needed their kids to watch over them when they are old. Kids needed their parents to help with their own kids. We needed family to give us security. We needed friends to support us both through good and bad times. Today, we can cope without all of them. There is a substitute for everyone.  And this kills the magic.

“We’ll just have symbolic presents” is what my family tells each other every Christmas, trying to make the whole dilemma easier. But this is stupid, because finding a good symbolic present is just as hard, if not harder, than buying a present-present – such as a new car or a diamond necklace. And at the end, the whole symbolism turns out to be exactly what Christmas is about. It is about being together and celebrating the true magic of life: being surrounded with people who love you, enjoying a great meal, good wine and a warm and comfortable home. Sharing love. That’s what we still need each other for! And you can’t buy that as a present, can you?

Yes, presents might be gone, but let’s not allow Grinch to steal Christmas!

Virtual Pollution

December 7th, 2009

Finally it is my time to bitch about Facebook! Our love relationship has turned into a love-hate relationship. I like(d) social networks. I am home in two different countries. Also, I went to an international school and an international university, and later worked in international business (woha, check this international chick out), so my friends are scattered all around the world. The networks are the the easiest way to keep in touch. So, I am everywhere: Facebook, Myspace, Linkedin, Xing, Small World, Internations, Twitter and some other site whose name I forgot. And yes, I admit, I have 390 friends on Facebook. And no, I don’t know them all – some of them are my readers who have expressed the wish to become my virtual friends. Virtual. That part is slowly fading away. But it is important because that is where the problem hides.

Few weeks ago, I posted  my dilemma about switching to Mac on Facebook. Within only few hours, I had 29 comments. Passionate comments. People were arguing and kept returning to see what the others replied. Last week, I posted that I was stuck at home with swine flu. Comments? 0. Zero. Welcome to the world of virtual friendships.

There is one slight problem with virtual friendships. No, three slight problems. Or more… One: We are spending more and more time in social networks. Meaning wasting time we could be spending in the real world, and also wasting money. CNN estimates costs of $2.2 billion a year due to the loss of productivity caused by time spent on networking sites. Problem number two: we are getting seduced by virtual friendships, maybe even allowing them to weaken the importance of the real friendships. What I learned with my post on having swine-flu is what sociologists are calling the phenomenon of “weak links”. We think we have 388 friends who are sharing our lives. We don’t. We have 388 virtual pan-pals who are only here when they want it. “Strong link” is my neighbour Markus. He fed me through closed door (yes, like you would feed a beast) while I was ill.

And what struck me most is that the social networks are strongly changing the way we begin romancing (and eventually end up having sex), which has a huge impact how we view and present our lives. Last two guys I met (yes, I admit, they were [much] younger than me) asked me for my Facebook contact. Phone numbers, even e-mail addresses, are passé. Hello, this is a revolution in our dating pattern! We used to get in touch so that we could get to know the person and see if we like him/her. Now, everything is upside down –we first get to know (the virtual) person, then we decide if we like him/her – and then we get in touch, or don’t. We are making decisions based on the ones-and-zeroes identity of the person. Dangerous. Because in the virtual world, what is missing is… yes, the real thing. Everyone is more or less same, and everyone can create the identity they chose to (do you really think I look like my Facebook pic?). We start thinking of our lives in terms of how presentable they are online.  How alienating is that?

I don’t know. I just know I’m cutting this thing to a minimum. I have already trained myself to only log on once a day. And I’ve introduced Facebook-free days. Mostly I combine them with news-free days. They are fantastic – suddenly life seems so easy and uncomplicated! You only have to remove the rubbish of other people’s destinies… Sorry, we’re just too many.

The Swine and the Flu

December 6th, 2009

Dear readers,

do not fear the swine flu!

I officially had it (this is why I haven’t been writing for a week) and – it is not as bad as it sounds. Actually, there are some positive sides to it.

1. Everybody is very scared for you and concerned about you. And the attention is GOOD!

2. Everybody is concerned but also scared of the virus, so – you have your peace.

3. The symptoms are so strong, that you immediately know it is not just a normal flu (I was out of breath after the 3rd word. And not because I was talking about sex!)

4. You get Tamiflu. Tamiflu kills all your symptoms (good) and it also makes you feel high, like you’re constantly smoked-up (good if you like the feeling). Don’t get scared of the hallucinations, delirium, changed behaviour, Japanese kids killing themselves, you will read about in the warning section. It is not that bad. I didn’t jump out of the window.

5. Tamiflu and the flu will fuck up your stomach. You will constantly feel sick and will constantly have to eat something (like some pregnant women). If you want to put on weight, this is good.

6. Tamiflu and the flu will make you TIRED. So you will be forced to catch up on the sleep for the past 10 years or so. I slept 11h in row, every night. This is good for your skin and your brain.

7. You might finally learn how it feels to be an animal in the zoo. My neighbour Markus was fantastic because everyday he bought my drugs/medicine and my food and left it in front of my door. Then he went to his flat, closed the door and called me. At first you like finding stuff in front of your door. But after a few days, you start feeling… offended by the isolation.

Let’s free the poor animals!

Kissing frogs good-bye!

November 23rd, 2009

Here are some breaking news for all bad-ass-aesthetically-spoiled-princesses like me!

Last night, I found a very interesting hypothesis by Bruno Bettelheim. In his “Kinder Brauchen Märchen”/“Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales”, he explains that the fairy-tales featuring beast grooms (like frogs and beasts) are all about how love and affection will turn sexuality, which the inexperienced perceive as something animalistic (the beast-groom), into an awarding act (the prince). He does not claim that is about kissing someone you actually don’t want to kiss.

So good-bye to the idea that good girls get awarded for kissing frogs and beasts!

(Yeah dad, I do remember what you told me: “A handsome man is good for a night, a good man is good for a life-time.” My intuition also does not completely agree with rejecting the frog thing, but… Damn it!)

And here my last frog-kiss. You can send in the prince!

ana_1